Home / UX / UI / Wee3Beasties

Wee3Beasties
Redesign

A responsive web redesign for a 100% volunteer-run nonprofit cat rescue — making it easier for adopters, donors, and volunteers to connect with cats in need.
Self-Pitched Project Responsive Web Nonprofit Team · 3 Weeks
[ Desktop — Hi-Fi Homepage ]
[ Mobile ]

Self-initiated. I identified the client, pitched the project to the founder, assembled the team, and led the stakeholder relationship throughout — all before a line of research was conducted.

Client
Wee3Beasties Cat Rescue
Role
UX Researcher & UI Designer
Timeline
3 Weeks
Tools
Figma · FigJam · Zoom · Otter AI
Team
Project Overview

An Amazing Organization. A Website That Wasn't.

Wee3Beasties is a 100% volunteer-run nonprofit dedicated to trapping, neutering, and rehoming feral and stray cats around New Prague, MN. Their website existed — but barely. Families looking to adopt, people wanting to donate, and potential volunteers were met with broken links, inaccessible design, and unclear next steps.

The Problem

The current site fails accessibility standards, lacks information about adoption, donation, and volunteering, and provides no clear path forward for any of its key audiences.

The Solution

Reorganize the site map, refresh the style guide, and redesign for responsiveness — with a clear focus on connecting adopters, donors, and volunteers to the cats who need them.

"It is not serving any real purpose. It exists as a conduit right now — has a lot of potential to be very helpful!"

— W3B Founder, Stakeholder Interview
01
Research
Heuristic eval, stakeholder interview, competitor analysis, user interviews
02
Define
Affinity diagram, persona, I like/I wish/what if, 2×2 matrix
03
IA & Structure
Card sorting, revised site map, task flow
04
Prototype
Sketches → mid-fi → style guide → hi-fi desktop + mobile
05
Test & Iterate
6 user tests across mid-fi and hi-fi; 3 rounds of iteration
Research

Understanding the Current Site & Its Users

Heuristic Evaluation

The team evaluated and annotated the existing site across three key pages — homepage, animals page, and about us. The issues went beyond aesthetics: accessibility failures, broken links, missing information, and confusing navigation made the site difficult for the audiences it most needed to serve.

[ Annotated Heuristic Evaluation — Current W3B Site ]
Heuristic evaluation annotations across the homepage, animals page, and about us page
Navigation is confusing — structure doesn't reflect how users think about the site
Colors do not pass WCAG contrast requirements
Fonts are off-putting — lack of typographic hierarchy throughout
Lack of hierarchy and grouping makes pages hard to scan
Broken links throughout — undermines trust
Photography is actually nice — but images are too small to be effective
Information is out of date and minimal — adoption, donation, and volunteer paths are all unclear
No clear CTAs — visitors have no guided next step regardless of their intent

Stakeholder Interview

I conducted a 30-minute Zoom interview with the founder while a teammate took notes — using Otter AI for transcription. The conversation surfaced both organizational priorities and specific design preferences that shaped every decision that followed.

My Contribution

Led the stakeholder interview. Prepared questions, facilitated the conversation, and identified key action items for the redesign.

[ Stakeholder Interview — Annotated Notes ]
Key takeaways from the founder interview — organizational priorities, site goals, and color/design preferences

Competitor Analysis

We analyzed shelters and rescues that users mentioned during interviews — chosen because they represent what the W3B audience already knows and expects. The gap was clear: W3B offered many of the same services but provided far less information and process clarity online.

[ Competitor Analysis ]
Competitor analysis — adoption info, donation pages, and volunteer pathways compared across similar organizations
Definition & Ideation

Themes from Research to Direction

Affinity Diagram

Insights from four user interviews were grouped into four themes that aligned with both user needs and stakeholder goals — adoption, shelter information, donations, and visual content.

[ Affinity Diagram ]
Four primary themes: adoption preferences, shelter information, donations & sponsorships, visual content
Adoption
  • Motivated to adopt older cats
  • Wants easy adoption process
  • Needs medical history upfront
  • Expects to meet cat first
Shelter Info
  • Adoption info too vague
  • Wants a phone number
  • Wants to see where cats are kept
Donations
  • Prefers items over money
  • Loves the Amazon wishlist
  • Wants to know where money goes
  • Curious: adoptable vs sponsor only
Visual Content
  • Cat photos are nice — too small
  • Loves featured pet section
  • Facebook callout well received
  • Font color choices hard to read

User Persona

Built from stakeholder demographics and user interview insights — Carla, a 32-year-old marketing manager in St. Paul with two adopted cats, who wants to bring home a feral cat but feels lost in the process.

[ User Persona — Carla Anderson ]
Carla Anderson, 32, St. Paul — wants to adopt a feral cat but finds the process unclear and intimidating
Information Architecture

Card Sorting & Site Map

Five card sorts revealed confusion in the existing navigation — a mix of top, side, and footer nav with no clear logic. The stakeholder's request for new informational pages made a restructured site map essential.

My Contribution — Card Sort

My card sort focused on reorganizing primary navigation to accommodate new pages. I moved "My Rescue" to the footer (low priority) and elevated Facebook and donations to the top — reflecting what both users and the stakeholder told us mattered most.

Original Navigation

Key pages buried under a "More" tab. Login and shopping cart icons with no clear purpose. No footer navigation.

Final Site Map

Clear primary nav: Home, Adopt, Support Us, News & Events, Contact. New pages added: volunteer info, stray/feral guidance, cat introduction resources, shop, glossary.

[ Final Site Map ]
Final site map — revised through prototype testing. Notable additions: Shop under Support Us, Glossary in footer for medical terms and acronyms
Prototyping

Sketches to Screens

Each team member built individual sketches and lo-fi wireframes. We reviewed together and combined the strongest elements into shared mid-fi designs — one page per person in a shared Figma file, so we could see how pages were shaping up alongside each other.

My Assigned Page — Adoption Information
  • Adoption form and detailed process/FAQs
  • Adoption counter and recently adopted section
  • CTAs throughout: donate, sponsor, volunteer
  • Large banner image to lead with W3B's strongest asset — the photography

Sketch Wireframes

[ Sketch — Adoption Page ]
Adoption Page Sketch
Large hero image, process steps, adoption form, CTAs
[ Sketch — Homepage ]
Homepage Sketch
[ Sketch — Cat Profile ]
Cat Profile Sketch
Stats section: age, medical, diet, temperament

Mid-Fidelity Wireframes

After mid-fi testing, testers found the adoption info page too long. Changes: FAQs moved to their own page, application moved to a separate page requiring deliberate intent, and sponsorship CTAs at the end reconsidered as off-topic.

[ Mid-Fi — Homepage ]
Homepage
[ Mid-Fi — Adopt ]
Adopt
[ Mid-Fi — Cat Profile ]
Cat Profile
[ Mid-Fi — Support Us ]
Support Us
Style Guide & Design System

Building a Shared Visual Language

A teammate created the final style guide from our collective moodboard research and stakeholder color preferences. I then built the Figma color and font library for the full team to use — ensuring consistency across five simultaneously-developed pages.

My Contribution

Created the Figma component library (colors, typography, button components with hover states) from the agreed-upon style guide. Also built reusable button components, made footer hover effects, and cleaned up teammates' files — aligning elements to the grid and standardizing spacing across pages.

Color Palette
[ Style Guide — Colors ]
Typography
[ Style Guide — Typography ]
Hi-Fidelity Design

Desktop & Mobile

Each team member applied the style guide to their assigned page. The final header was a compromise between two designs; the footer was one of my two proposed options. Three rounds of iteration on the adoption page based on testing feedback.

Adoption Page — Three Versions

Hi-Fi v1 — Adoption Page
v1 — Initial
Catnip green + blue palette, large images, soft shapes. Revised pre-testing to better match other pages.
Hi-Fi v2 — Adoption Page
v2 — After Team Review
New header incorporated, additional colors added, header image resized to match site-wide standard.
Hi-Fi v3 — Adoption Page
v3 — After Testing
Process steps moved above fold — explaining the adoption process is the primary goal of the page.

Final Desktop Screens

Homepage
Homepage
Adopt
Adopt
Cat Profile
Cat Profile
Support Us
Support Us
[ Homepage ]
Homepage — hero image, featured cats, and primary navigation
[ Adopt ]
Adopt page — browsable cat listings with adoption process steps above the fold
[ Cat Profile ]
Cat profile — individual cat detail page with photos, biography, and adoption CTA
[ Support Us ]
Support Us — donation options, volunteer opportunities, and wishlist

Mobile Prototype

For mobile I broke the adoption application into four shorter pages — making the process feel less daunting on a small screen. I also took a teammate's menu drawer and made the dropdown arrows functional between v1 and v2.

My Mobile Contributions
  • Reformatted desktop footer for mobile — shared with full team
  • Revised menu drawer dropdown functionality
  • Split adoption application into 4 mobile pages for usability
[ Mobile — Home ]
Home
[ Mobile — Adopt ]
Adopt
[ Mobile — Apply 1 ]
Apply — Part 1
[ Mobile — Apply 2 ]
Apply — Part 2
Final Thoughts

What I'd Do Differently

This project produced a genuinely useful redesign for an organization that needed it. It also surfaced real lessons about team design workflow that I'd apply immediately if starting over.

Fewer Hands on Hi-Fi
Five people all wanting to practice Figma led to inconsistent pages. In hindsight I'd have one or two people own hi-fi execution, with the rest contributing to research and testing.
Platform Research Earlier
We only discovered late that rescuegroups.org has layout restrictions. Earlier investigation would have grounded design decisions in the actual constraints from the start.
Continue Iterating
Increase photo sizes, revisit logo, reduce color palette, split desktop application across multiple pages, and address remaining inconsistencies — the work isn't done.
More UX / UI Work
Bon Voyager Mockup
UX / UI · Mobile App
Bon Voyager
Outcomes Inc. Mockup
UX / UI · Web Redesign
Outcomes Inc.
WheelWise Mockup
UX / UI · Mobile App
WheelWise
National Weather Service Mockup
UX / UI · Web Redesign
National Weather Service